티스토리 뷰


 
While extant research generally supports restorative justice as an alternative to traditional juvenile court processing, much of this research is limited to short-term follow-up periods examining only prevalence of reoffense. In addition, recent meta-analyses point to several study design characteristics, the impacts of which are not well understood. This study compared long-term outcomes of youth referred to restorative justice and traditional juvenile court processing using multiple outcome measures. Specifically, the authors examined the impact of restorative justice referral on prevalence of reoffense, number of later official contacts, and seriousness of later offending behavior over several follow-up periods up to four years post-referral.


[시간없으신 분들을 위한 번역본 : 의역 많다고 징징대지 말 것!]


'RESEARCHER' 카테고리의 다른 글

사회를 어떻게 연구할 것인가  (0) 2008.11.04
양대 혁명과 사회학의 탄생 그리고 성격  (0) 2008.11.04
2008. 9. 19. workshop  (0) 2008.10.31
2008. 8. 26. workshop  (0) 2008.10.31
2008. 8. 11 workshop  (0) 2008.10.31